Talk:Jedi Academy Ranks: Difference between revisions
Setementor (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Don't see how this is an improvement. Just repeating information from the specific rank articles. Why not just list the ranks, give a brief description of each, and then link to the respective article dedicated to that rank? | Don't see how this is an improvement. Just repeating information from the specific rank articles. Why not just list the ranks, give a brief description of each, and then link to the respective article dedicated to that rank? - R2 | ||
As stated, I added the slightly outdated former staff listings (which I gathered several years ago) to the article (and so would have been tidier to change the page's layout somewhat) - I wasn't aware that some of them were already stated in the specific rank articles. I'll move and merg them with the appropriate articles shortly. - Setementor | As stated, I added the slightly outdated former staff listings (which I gathered several years ago) to the article (and so would have been tidier to change the page's layout somewhat) - I wasn't aware that some of them were already stated in the specific rank articles. I'll move and merg them with the appropriate articles shortly. - Setementor | ||
Yea, the listings are definitely outdated on the respective rank articles. In addition, it appears your lists are not as complete too, so a combination may provide the most comprehensive listings so far. [[User:R2D2|R2D2]] 09:25, 10 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 15:25, 10 December 2007
Don't see how this is an improvement. Just repeating information from the specific rank articles. Why not just list the ranks, give a brief description of each, and then link to the respective article dedicated to that rank? - R2
As stated, I added the slightly outdated former staff listings (which I gathered several years ago) to the article (and so would have been tidier to change the page's layout somewhat) - I wasn't aware that some of them were already stated in the specific rank articles. I'll move and merg them with the appropriate articles shortly. - Setementor
Yea, the listings are definitely outdated on the respective rank articles. In addition, it appears your lists are not as complete too, so a combination may provide the most comprehensive listings so far. R2D2 09:25, 10 December 2007 (CST)